Abstract
‘Metaphysics’, said Bradley, ‘is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe on instinct, but to find these reasons is no less an instinct.’ This idea that reasoning is both instinctive and feeble is reminiscent of Hume; except that reasons in Hume tend to serve as the solvent rather than the support of instinctive beliefs. Instinct leads us to play backgammon with other individuals whom we assume inhabit a world which exists independently of our own perception and which will continue to exist tomorrow in a similar fashion to today. However, when instinct leads us also to reason about these beliefs they are all subject to sceptical attack. Their defence provides a challenge, a challenge which in thumbnail histories of the subject is met by Kant. He does this by use of a powerful new form of argument which he calls transcendental argument and which, in my opinion, provides not only reasons but also good reasons for the defence of some of our most central instinctive beliefs. The strategy involved in this kind of argument is to reflect on the necessary preconditions for comprehensible experience. In this way, some beliefs which are subject to sceptical attack, such as that there is a causal order between objects which exist independently of our experience of them, can be found to be the essential preconditions for having comprehensible experience at all. The reason for accepting them is, therefore, that they are the necessary preconditions of having any beliefs at all; and this provides a good, rather than a bad, reason for accepting these particular instinctive beliefs
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0957042X00001620
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics.James Cargile - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):320-323.
The Bounds of Sense.P. F. Strawson - 1966 - Philosophy 42 (162):379-382.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Perception and Reflection.Anil Gomes - 2017 - Philosophical Perspectives 31 (1):131-152.
The Nature of Transcendental Arguments.Mark Sacks - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):439 – 460.
Once More Unto The Breach: Strawson's Anti-Sceptical View.Marco Antonio Franciotti - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (2):137-152.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Response to Skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
The Nature of Transcendental Arguments.Mark Sacks - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):439 – 460.
Strawson on Transcendental Idealism.H. E. Matthews - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (76):204-220.
Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty.Robert Stern - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
Recent Reinterpretations of the Transcendental.Sami Pihlstr - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (3):289 – 314.
Recent Reinterpretations of the Transcendental.Sami Pihlström - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (3):289-314.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
80 ( #126,891 of 2,421,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes