The morality of law and economics

Law and Philosophy 11 (4):331 - 384 (1992)
Abstract
The moral heart of normative law and economics is efficiency, especially dynamic efficiency that takes incentive effects into account. In the economic theory, justificatory argument is inherently at the institutional- or rule-level, not an the individual- or case-level. InMarkets, Morals, and the Law Jules Coleman argues against the efficiency theory on normative grounds. Although he strongly asserts the need to view law institutionally, he frequently grounds his criticisms of law and economics in arguments from little more than direct moral intuition about individual cases. He evidently holds that consent provides a better normative basis for law than does efficiency and he uses consent arguments to attack recommendations from scholars in law and economics. His own chief contribution, however, is to law and economics rather than to any alternative theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01003982
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Law and Social Order.Russell Hardin - 2001 - Noûs 35 (s1):61 - 85.
Law and Social Order.Russell Hardin - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):61-85.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #175,648 of 2,193,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #145,717 of 2,193,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature