Open Philosophy 3 (1):132-146 (2020)

Graham Harman
American University in Cairo
This article contends that the central principle of modern philosophy is obscured by a side-debate between two opposed camps that are united in accepting a deeper flawed premise. Consider the powerful critiques of Kantian philosophy offered by Quentin Meillassoux and Bruno Latour, respectively. These two thinkers criticize Kant for opposite reasons: Meillassoux because Kant collapses thought and world into a permanent “correlate” without isolated terms, and Latour because Kant tries to purify thought and world from each other rather than realizing that they are always combined in “hybrid” form. What both critiques tacitly accept is the notion that “thought” and “world” are the two major poles of the universe. I claim that this stems from the post-Cartesian assumption that thought and world are the two basic kinds of things that exist. The name “onto-taxonomy” is introduced for this view.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/opphil-2020-0009
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Non-Correlational Thought.Steven Shaviro - 2015 - In Christoph Cox, Jenny Jaskey & Suhail Malik (eds.), Realism Materialism Art. Sternberg Press. pp. 193-198.
The End of the World After the End of Finitude: On a Recently Prominent Speculative Tone in Philosophy.Jussi Backman - 2017 - In Marcia Cavalcante Schuback & Susanna Lindberg (eds.), The End of the World: Contemporary Philosophy and Art. London: Rowman and Littlefield International. pp. 105-123.
The Necessity of Contingency or Contingent Necessity: Meillassoux, Hegel, and the Subject.John Van Houdt - 2011 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 7 (1):128-141.
Transcendentalism, Nomicity and Modal Thought.Valentin Muresan - 1996 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (3):49-59.
Kant’s Political Writings.John J. Ansbro - 1971 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 20:289-293.
Kant’s Political Writings. [REVIEW]John J. Ansbro - 1971 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 20:289-293.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #445,699 of 2,333,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #28,348 of 2,333,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes