Philosophia 40 (2):271-283 (2012)
This paper seeks a better understanding of the role of public reason in alimenting or defusing religious conflicts by looking at how courts apply it in deciding cases arising out of them. Recent scholarship and judicial decisions suggest, paradoxically, that courts can be biased towards either the secular or the religious. This risks alienating both religious majorities and religious and secular minorities. Judicial public reason is uniquely equipped to protect minorities, and its costs to religious majorities may be mitigated by accepting religious morality and identity claims in the political and legislative realm. Despite the political fragilities of judicial public reason, it is not intrinsically hostile to religious claims. It ought in fact to be fully equipped to recognize the equality and religious freedom rights that religious groups and individuals might assert in pursuing exemptions from general secular laws. Judicial public reason does have the potential to defuse religious conflicts, however much it falls short in practice.
|Keywords||Rawls Public reason Religion Courts Constitutionalism Rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 2011 - Free Press.
Laïcité in Reverse: Mono-Religious Democracies and the Issue of Religion in the Public Sphere.Nadia Urbinati - 2010 - Constellations 17 (1):4-21.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Equal Accessibility to All: Habermas, Pragmatism, and the Place of Religious Beliefs in a Post-Secular Society.Roberto Frega - 2012 - Constellations 19 (2):267-287.
Religious Voices in Public Places.Nigel Biggar & Linda Hogan (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
The Use of “Public Reason” by Religious and Secular Citizens: Limitations of Habermas' Conception of the Role of Religion in the Public Realm.Andrea Baumeister - 2011 - Constellations 18 (2):222-243.
How (Not What) Shall We Think About Human Rights and Religious Arguments: Public Reasoning and Beyond.Mathias Thaler - 2010 - E-Cadernos CES (9):115–133.
''On Highest Authority: Do Religious Reasons Have a Place in Public Policy Debates?''.Zachary Hoskins - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):393-412.
The Intellectual Crisis of a Good Idea.Max L. Stackhouse - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):263-268.
Why and How Secular Society Should Accommodate Religion: A Philosophical Proposal.Edmund F. Byrne - 2010 - Edwin Mellen Press.
Boundary Work: Transcendence and Authoriality in Religious and Secular Law. [REVIEW]David S. Caudill - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):149-161.
Religious Parties, Religious Political Identity, and the Cold Shoulder of Liberal Democratic Thought.Nancy L. Rosenblum - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):23-53.
Added to index2011-12-27
Total downloads20 ( #250,102 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?