What do brain data really show?

Philosophy of Science 69 (3):572-582 (2002)
Abstract
There is a bias in neuroscience toward localizing and modularizing brain functions. Single cell recording, imaging studies, and the study of neurological deficits all feed into the Gallian view that different brain areas do different things and the things being done are confined to particular processing streams. At the same time, there is a growing sentiment that brains probably don’t work like that after all; it is better to conceive of them as fundamentally distributed units, multi‐tasking at every level. This sentiment, however, is much less congenial to the tried‐and‐true experimental protocols available today and to theorizing about the brain in general. This essay examines the tension between current experimental methods and large-scale views of the brain. We argue that this disconnection between experiment and what really are guiding theoretical metaphors seriously impedes progress in neuroscience
Keywords Brain  Experiment  Function  Neuroscience  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/341769
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,126
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Images Are Not the Evidence in Neuroimaging.Colin Klein - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):265-278.
Philosophical Issues in Neuroimaging.Colin Klein - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):186-198.
Searching for the Neural Realizers of Ownership Unity.Rex Welshon - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):839 - 862.
The Analysis of Data and the Evidential Scope of Neuroimaging Results.Jessey Wright - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axx012.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Localization in the Brain and Other Illusions.Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart - 2005 - In Andrew Brook (ed.), Cognition and the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

111 ( #44,752 of 2,171,820 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,616 of 2,171,820 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums