Legal Theory 14 (2):113-133 (2008)

Abstract
Criminal sanctions are typically inflicted by the state. The central role of the state in determining the severity of these sanctions and inflicting them requires justification. One justification for state-inflicted sanctions is simply that the state is more likely than other agents to determine accurately what a wrongdoer justly deserves and to inflict a just sanction on those who deserve it. Hence, in principle, the state could be replaced by other agents, for example, private individuals. This hypothesis has given rise to recent calls to reform the state's criminal justice system by introducing privately inflicted sanctions, for example, shaming penalties, private prisons, or private probationary services. This paper challenges this view and argues that the agency of the state is indispensable to criminal sanctions. Privately inflicted sanctions sever the link between the state's judgments concerning the wrongfulness of the action and the appropriateness of the sanction and the infliction of sufferings on the criminal. When a private individual inflicts punishment, she acts on what she and not the state judges to be a justified response to a criminal act. Privately inflicted sanctions for violations of criminal laws are not grounded in the judgments of the appropriate agent, namely the state. It is impermissible on the part of the state to approve, encourage, or initiate the infliction of a sanction on an alleged wrongdoer on the basis of a private judgment. Such an approval grants undue weight to the private judgment of the individual who inflicts the sanction.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S135232520808004X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Criminalizing the State.François Tanguay-Renaud - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):255-284.
Privatising War: Assessing the Decision to Hire Private Military Contractors.Isaac Taylor - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):148-168.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Desert and Fairness in Criminal Justice.Erin I. Kelly - 2012 - Philosophical Topics 40 (1):63-77.
Just War Principles and Economic Sanctions.Albert C. Pierce - 1996 - Ethics and International Affairs 10:99–113.
Dirty Bombs and Garbage Cases.Christopher Uggen - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74:707-711.
Dirty Bombs and Garbage Cases.Christopher Uggen - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (2):707-711.
Mass Incarceration and the Theory of Punishment.Vincent Chiao - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):431-452.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
50 ( #228,810 of 2,520,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes