Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):341-342 (2004)

Krueger & Funder's (K&F's) diagnosis of social psychology's obsession with bias is correct and accords with similar observations by self-categorization theorists. However, the analysis of causes is incomplete and suggestions for cures are flawed. The primary problem is not imbalance, but a failure to acknowledge that social reality has different forms, depending on one's social and political vantage point in relation to a specific social context.
Keywords 1701 Psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x04360085
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Social Psychology: A Field in Search of a Center.Joachim I. Krueger & David C. Funder - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):361-367.
Exploring Social Desirability Bias.Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
The Goodness of Judgment Index.Lee Jussim - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):344-345.
Social Reality.Finn Collin - 1997 - Routledge.
Constructing the Social.Theodore R. Sarbin & John I. Kitsuse (eds.) - 1994 - Sage Publications.
The “Bias” Bias in Social Psychology: Adaptive When and How?James Friedrich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):335-336.
From Disorder to Coherence in Social Psychology.Todd K. Shackelford & Robin R. Vallacher - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):356-356.


Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #419,654 of 2,448,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,050 of 2,448,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes