Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 8 (62):1-7 (2014)

Authors
Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo
Russell Poldrack
Stanford University
Abstract
We discuss recent progress in the development of cognitive ontologies and summarize three challenges in the coordinated development and application of these resources. Challenge 1 is to adopt a standardized definition for cognitive processes. We describe three possibilities and recommend one that is consistent with the standard view in cognitive and biomedical sciences. Challenge 2 is harmonization. Gaps and conflicts in representation must be resolved so that these resources can be combined for mark-up and interpretation of multi-modal data. Finally, Challenge 3 is to test the utility of these resources for large-scale annotation of data, search and query, and knowledge discovery and integration. As term definitions are tested and revised, harmonization should enable coordinated updates across ontologies. However, the true test of these definitions will be in their community-wide adoption which will test whether they support valid inferences about psychological and neuroscientific data.
Keywords cognitive ontology  neuro-ontology  Cognitive Paradigm Ontology  Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Cathedral and the Bazaar.Eric Raymond - 1999 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12 (3):23-49.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Putting Biomedical Ontologies to Work.Barry Smith & Mathias Brochhausen - 2010 - Methods of Information in Medicine 49 (2):135-40.
Interdisciplinary Success Without Integration.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):343-360.
Ontology for the Intelligence Analyst.Barry Smith - 2012 - CrossTalk 14 (Nov/Dec):18-25.
Integration of Cognitive and Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Definitions in Ontologies.Selja Seppälä, Alan Ruttenberg, Yonatan Schreiber & Barry Smith - 2016 - Cahiers de Lexicologie 109 (2):175‐207.
Against Idiosyncrasy in Ontology Development.Barry Smith - 2006 - In B. Bennett & C. Fellbaum (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS). Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 15-26.
Do the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Need Each Other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
James Mark Baldwin: A Bridge Between Social and Cognitive Theories of Development.Patricia E. Kahlbaugh - 1993 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23 (1):79–103.
Unification Strategies in Cognitive Science.Marcin Miłkowski - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 48 (1):13–33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-28

Total views
147 ( #59,737 of 2,331,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #29,773 of 2,331,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes