Panpsychism and Causation: A New Argument and a Solution to the Combination Problem

Dissertation, Oslo (2014)
Abstract
Panpsychism is the view that every concrete and unified thing has some form of phenomenal consciousness or experience. It is an age-old doctrine, which, to the surprise of many, has recently taken on new life. In philosophy of mind, it has been put forth as a simple and radical solution to the mind–body problem (Chalmers 1996, 2003;Strawson 2006; Nagel 1979, 2012). In metaphysics and philosophy of science, it has been put forth as a solution to the problem of accounting for the intrinsic nature of the physical itself (Strawson 2006, Seager 2006). In this thesis, I show that panpsychism can also be defended on the basis of an argument from our (arguable) acquaintance with the nature of causation in agency. This argument has made frequent appearances throughout the history of philosophy, with philosophers such as Leibniz, Schopenhauer and James, and I construct and defend an updated version of it. Furthermore, I offer a solution to the combination problem: how can complex (human and animal-type) consciousness result from simple (fundamental particle-type) consciousness? This is generally regarded as the most serious problem facing contemporary panpsychism. I propose that mental combination can be construed as kind causal process culminating in a fusion, and show how this avoids the main difficulties with accounting for mental combination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives.Godehard Bruntrup & Ludwig Jaskolla (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford University Press USA.
Consciousness and Fundamental Reality.Philip Goff - 2017 - New York, USA: Oup Usa.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Problem of Mental Causation and the Nature of Properties.S. C. Gibb - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):464-75.
Consciousness, Information, and Panpsychism.William E. Seager - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):272-88.
The 'Intrinsic Nature' Argument for Panpsychism.William E. Seager - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):129-145.
Panpsychism—a Neglected Jamesian Alternative?Sami Pihlström - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:319-347.
Emergentist Panpsychism.William Seager - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (9-10):9-10.
Presentism and Causation Revisited.Sam Baron - 2012 - Philosophical Papers 41 (1):1-21.
Added to PP index
2015-06-03

Total downloads
1,750 ( #318 of 2,210,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
640 ( #137 of 2,210,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature