Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):183-195 (2012)
Abstract |
The academic debate over the propriety of attributing moral responsibility to corporations is decades old and ongoing. The conventional approach to this debate is to identify the sufficient conditions for moral agency and then attempt to determine whether corporations possess them. This article recommends abandoning the conventional approach in favor of an examination of the practical consequences of corporate moral responsibility. The article’s thesis is that such an examination reveals that attributing moral responsibility to corporations is ethically acceptable only if it does not authorize the punishment of corporations as collective entities, and further, that this renders the debate over corporate moral responsibility virtually pointless
|
Keywords | Corporate moral responsibility Collective punishment Shared intention Collective responsibility |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-011-1032-5 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency.Michael E. Bratman - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
The Corporation as a Moral Person.Peter A. French - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
View all 24 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Corporate Character, Corporate Virtues.Geoff Moore - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):99-114.
Firm Responses to Mass Outrage: Technology, Blame, and Employment.Vikram R. Bhargava - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 163 (3):379-400.
View all 12 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. [REVIEW]Jacquie L'Etang - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
Corporate Moral Responsibility: When It Might Matter.Michael J. Phillips - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):555-576.
Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Damage.J. Angelo Corlett - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):195-207.
Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jan Edward Garrett - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):535 - 545.
Corporate Moral Responsibility: What Can We Infer From Our Understanding of Organisations? [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation.Michael J. Phillips - 1992 - Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4):435-459.
Corporate Moral Responsibility in Health Care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility.Richard H. Guerrette - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):409 - 415.
Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility.Elsa González - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):101 - 108.
Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility.C. Soares - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150.
Corporate Executives: Disasters and Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW]Robert Larmer - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):785 - 788.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-01-10
Total views
69 ( #166,579 of 2,507,565 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,565 )
2012-01-10
Total views
69 ( #166,579 of 2,507,565 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,565 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads