Reflections on the minimal state

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):115-128 (2003)
Abstract
This article challenges the traditional argument for the state that holds that because the market is unable to supply the rule-making, adjudicative, and enforcement services that are essential to life in society, the state must, and hence is morally justified. The author argues that the market's inability to supply these basic services proves only that the state must ensure that they are supplied, not that it must supply them itself. This implies that the traditional concept of the minimal state as one that supplies only these basic services is flawed. The `remedial state' (one that regulates the private provision of these services) is actually the minimal state. Key Words: anarchy • libertarianism • minimal state • political obligation • protective agency • public goods.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X03002001426
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rothbard’s and Hoppe’s Justifications of Libertarianism.M. Eabrasu - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):288-307.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
46 ( #128,525 of 2,231,945 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #80,692 of 2,231,945 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature