Scrutiny of Einstein's Geodesic and Field Equations

Abstract

Since its final version and publication in 1916, it is widely reported in several specialized textbooks and research articles that general relativity theory may be reduced to the Newton's gravity theory in the limit of a weak gravitational field and slow motion of the material bodies. In the present paper, the so-called reducibility of Einstein's geodesic and field equations to Newton's equation of motion and Poisson's gravitational potential equation, respectively, is scrutinized and proven to be mathematically, physically and dimensionally wrong and also the geometrization of gravity is not really necessary.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Geodesic Universality in General Relativity.Michael Tamir - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1076-1088.
Field theory onR×S 3 topology. VI: Gravitation. [REVIEW]M. Carmeli & S. Malin - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (4):407-417.
The genesis and structure of models in the modern theory of gravity.R. M. Nugayev - 1987 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):84 – 104.
Proving the principle: Taking geodesic dynamics too seriously in Einstein's theory.Michael Tamir - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2):137-154.
Gravity as a Finslerian Metric Phenomenon.Elisabetta Barletta & Sorin Dragomir - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (3):436-453.
Einstein's unification.Jeroen van Dongen - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-26

Downloads
411 (#42,241)

6 months
93 (#38,080)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references