Vivarium 46 (3):232-252 (2008)
AbstractAlbertus Magnus favours the Aristotelian definition of the soul as the first actuality or perfection of a natural body having life potentially. But he interprets Aristotle's vocabulary in a way that it becomes compatible with the separability of the soul from the body. The term “perfectio” is understood as referring to the soul's activity only, not to its essence. The term “forma” is avoided as inadequate for defining the soul's essence. The soul is understood as a substance which exists independently of its actions and its body. The article shows that Albertus' terminological decisions continue a tradition reaching from the Greek commentators, and John Philoponos in particular, to Avicenna. Albertus' position on another important issue is also influenced by Arabic sources. His defense of the unity of the soul's vegetative, animal and rational parts rests on arguments from Avicenna and Averroes. It is shown that Averroes' position on the problem is not clearcut: he advocates the unity thesis, but also teaches the plurality of the generic and individual forms in man. This double stance is visible in the Latin reception of Averroes' works, and also in Albertus, who presents Averroes both as supporter and opponent of the plurality thesis.
Similar books and articles
Averroës' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's de Anima: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text. Averroës - 2002 - Brigham Young University Press.
The Relationship Between Soul and Spirit in Greek and Latin Patristic Thought.Alexey R. Fokin - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):599-614.
The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle's Philosophy of Living Nature.A. P. Bos - 2003 - Brill.
Plotinus on the Soul's Omnipresence in Body.J. S. & M. Gary - 2008 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):113-127.
Avicenna's De Anima in the Latin West: The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul 1160-1300.Dag Nikolaus Hasse - 2000 - The Warburg Institute.
The Soul's Instrument for Touching in Aristotle, on the Soul II 11, 422b34–423a21.Abraham P. Bos - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (1):89-102.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Aquinas and Aristotelians on Whether the Soul is a Group of Powers.Nicholas Kahm - 2017 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (2):115-32.
Influence of Arabic and Islamic Philosophy on the Latin West.Dag Nikolaus Hasse - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mirum Est Si Intellectus Noster Omnem Scientiam Accipiens Ex Phantasmate.Ile Vlad - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 23.
Transcending Natural Philosophy or Disregarding Metaphysics? : Albert the Great on Humors, Reason and Intellect.Vlad Ile - 2020 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 23 (1):117-140.
References found in this work
Essence and Existence.John F. Wippel - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 385--410.
Two Early Oxford Masters on the Problem of Plurality of Forms. Adam of Buckfield — Richard Rufus of Cornwall.Daniel A. Callus - 1939 - Revue Néo-Scolastique de Philosophie 42 (63):411-445.
Das Lehrstück von den vier Intellekten in der Scholastik - von den arabischen Quellen bis zu Albertus Magnus.D. N. Hasse - 1999 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 66 (1):21-78.