Apeiron 54 (2):203-232 (2021)
AbstractIn this article I propose a new interpretation of Aristotle’s arguments about the authority of the many at Politics III 11, 1281a40–b21. It consists of the following main tenets. First, the multitude that Aristotle refers to in his arguments should be understood on the model of the multitude which rules in polities and the members of which are accomplished in only a part of political excellence, namely, military excellence. Second, the best citizens with whom he compares that multitude in his arguments do not possess complete political excellence but rather the highest degree of military excellence among their fellow citizens in a polity. Third, the members of that multitude are collectively superior to the best citizens in making decisions about political particulars, for example, decisions about specific policies. Fourth, their superiority can be explained by reference to the fact that they collectively possess superior experience than the best citizens, though they have individually and collectively inferior political understanding. Finally, their collective superiority in making political decisions is the outcome of the aggregation of their individual political judgements that are based on experience rather than the outcome of some form of public deliberation that enables them to grasp the political reasons which support their decisions.
Similar books and articles
Every Man a Legislator: Aristotle on Political Wisdom.Dhananjay Jagannathan - 2019 - Apeiron 52 (4):395-414.
Aristotle's Many Multitudes And Their Powers.Cathal Woods - 2017 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 11 (1):110-143.
Popular Rule, Political Excellence, Wisdom, and the Rule of the Law: Democracy as Aristotle's Best Regime in "Politics" 3.Clifford Angell Bates - 1995 - Dissertation, Northern Illinois University
Authority and Aristotle: The Politics of Deliberation in Ancient Athens.John M. Carvalho - 1987 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
Civic Equality and Social Justice in Aristotle's ``Politics''.David Ronald Gill - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Aristotle's Liberalism: Political Virtue and its Restraint.Eric Spencer Petrie - 1991 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Polity, Political Justice and Political Mixing.Thornton Lockwood Jnr - 2006 - History of Political Thought 27 (2):207-222.
Polity, Political Justice and Political Mixing.Thornton C. Lockwood - 2006 - History of Political Thought 27 (2):207-222.
Aristotle on the Politics of Marriage: ‘Marital Rule’ in the Politics.David J. Riesbeck - 2015 - Classical Quarterly 65 (1):134-152.
How Could Aristotle Defend the Self-Sufficiency of Political Life While Claiming the Superiority of Contemplative Life?Serdar Tekin - 2016 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):13-26.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.David M. Estlund - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Action, Contemplation, and Happiness: An Essay on Aristotle.C. D. C. Reeve - 2012 - Harvard University Press.
Disunity in Aristotelian Virtues: A Reply to Richard Kraut.Terence H. Irwin - 1988 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:87-90.