Interaction Studies 12 (3):418-429 (2011)

Abstract
Although chimpanzees have been reported to understand to some extent others' visual perception, previous studies using food requesting tasks are divided on whether or not chimpanzees understand the role of eye gaze. One plausible reason for this discrepancy may be the familiarity of the testing situation. Previous food requesting tasks with negative results used an unfamiliar situation that may be difficult for some chimpanzees to recognize as a requesting situation, whereas those with positive results used a familiar situation. The present study tested chimpanzees' understanding of others' attentional states by comparing two requesting situations: an unfamiliar situation in which food was put on a table, and a familiar situation in which chimpanzees requested food held by an experimenter. Chimpanzees showed evidence of understanding the experimenter's attentional variations and the role of eye gaze only in the latter task. This suggests that an unfamiliar requesting situation may keep subjects from expressing their understanding of others' attentional states even though they are sensitive to them. Keywords: Understanding attention; Social cognition; Chimpanzees
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/is.12.3.03hat
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,536
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Chimpanzees Know About Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind.Josep Call & Michael Tomasello - 2005 - In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 45--64.
On the Lack of Evidence That Non-Human Animals Possess Anything Remotely Resembling a 'Theory of Mind'.Derek C. Penn & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2007 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 362 (1480):731-744.
Anthropomorphism, Parsimony, and Common Ancestry.Elliott Sober - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (3):229-238.
The Proper Study of Chimpkind.R. Allen Gardner - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):624-625.
Why Not Chimpanzees, Lions, and Hyenas Too?Richard Schuster - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):716-717.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-07

Total views
24 ( #423,836 of 2,385,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,835 of 2,385,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes