Informal Logic 16 (3) (1994)

In this paper, after showing how the postmodern critiques of Enlightenment rationality apply to critical thinking, I argue that a critical discussion on any subject must assume specific principles of rationality. I then show how these principles can be used to critique and reject postmodern claims about the contextual nature of rationality
Keywords Contextualism, critical thinking,epistemology, postmodernism, rationality, relativism, Rorty
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Modern Political Theory and the Multivocity of Postmodern Critical Discourses.Tom Bridges - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (1):3-4.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Critical Thinking and Learning.Mark Mason - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):339–349.
Critical Thinking and the End(s) of Psychology.Suzanne R. Kirschner - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):173-183.
Critical Thinking and Foundational Development.Wouter van Haaften & Ger Snik - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):19-41.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #436,273 of 2,448,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,192 of 2,448,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes