Critical Thinking, Postmodernism, and Rational Evaluation

Informal Logic 16 (3) (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, after showing how the postmodern critiques of Enlightenment rationality apply to critical thinking, I argue that a critical discussion on any subject must assume specific principles of rationality. I then show how these principles can be used to critique and reject postmodern claims about the contextual nature of rationality



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Critical thinking and learning.Mark Mason - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):339–349.
Critical thinking and the end(s) of psychology.Suzanne R. Kirschner - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):173-183.
Critical Thinking and Foundational Development.Wouter van Haaften & Ger Snik - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):19-41.


Added to PP

26 (#462,850)

6 months
1 (#479,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Myth of the Framework.Karl R. Popper - 1987 - In Joseph C. Pitt & Marcello Pera (eds.), Rational Changes in Science. Essays on Scientific Reasoning: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 98. Dordrecht: pp. 35-62.
Modern Political Theory and the Multivocity of Postmodern Critical Discourses.Tom Bridges - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (1):3-4.

Add more references