Making it implicit: Brandom on rule-following

In Making it Explicit, Brandom aims to articulate an account of conceptual content that accommodates its normativity--a requirement on theories of content that Brandom traces to Wittgenstein's rule following considerations. It is widely held that the normativity requirement cannot be met, or at least not with ease, because theories of content face an intractable dilemma. Brandom proposes to evade the dilemma by adopting a middle road--one that uses normative vocabulary, but treats norms as implicit in practices. I argue that this proposal fails to evade the dilemma, as Brandom himself understands it. Despite his use of normative vocabulary, Brandom's theory fares no better than the reductionist theories he criticises. I consider some responses that Brandom might make to my charges, and finally conclude that his proposal founders on his own criteria
Keywords Content  Epistemology  Normativity  Brandom, R  Wittgenstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00269.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Meaning Normative?Anandi Hattiangadi - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

193 ( #22,370 of 2,169,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,130 of 2,169,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums