Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania
As British and American idealism waned, new realisms displaced them. The common background of these new realisms emphasized the problem of the external world and the mind-body problem, as bequeathed by Reid, Hamilton, and Mill. During this same period, academics on both sides of the Atlantic recognized that the natural sciences were making great strides. Responses varied. In the United States, philosophical response focused particularly on functional psychology and Darwinian adaptedness. This article examines differing versions of that response in William James and Roy Wood Sellars. James viewed the mind as a “fighter for ends.” His neutral monism, by taming the mind-body problem and the problem of the external world, provided a secure metaphysics of mind as functional activity. In contrast, Sellars ’s scientific realism endorsed physical reality but was not mechanistic or reductionist. His critical realism and evolutionary naturalism offered novel metaphysical and epistemological positions in comparison with other American and British realisms. James and Sellars are distinguished from British philosophy in 1890–1918 in the types of realism they endorsed and in their success at introducing Darwinian evolutionary considerations and functional psychology into mainstream philosophy.
Keywords realism  William James  Roy Wood Sellars  naturalism  psychology  functional psychology  neutral monism  evolution  critical realism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/680373
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 98 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity.Peter Olen - 2016 - London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Hatfield on American Critical Realism.Alexander Klein - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):154-166.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sellars, Realism, and Kantian Thinking.Willem A. deVries - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Sellars on Perception, Science, and Realism: A Critical Response.Patrick J. Reider - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Sellars, Scientific Realism, and Sensa.James W. Cornman - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):417-51.
Sellars’s Ryleans Revisited.Robert M. Gordon - 2000 - ProtoSociology 14:102-114.
Back to Roy Wood Sellars: Why His Evolutionary Naturalism is Still Worthwhile.Pouwel Slurink - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):425-449.
Critical Realism and the Time Problem. I.R. W. Sellars - 1908 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 5 (20):542-548.
Critical Realism and the Time Problem: II.R. W. Sellars - 1908 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 5 (22):597-602.
Neglected Alternatives; Critical Essays.Roy Wood Sellars - 1973 - Lewisburg, Bucknell University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
625 ( #12,961 of 2,507,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #19,877 of 2,507,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes