Suárez and Descartes: A Priori Arguments Against Substantial Forms and the Decline of the Formal Cause

Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (2):143-162 (2011)

Authors
Helen Hattab
University of Houston
Abstract
In hac dissertatione primo ostendo Cartesii “argumentum a priori” contra formas substantiales proprie intelligendum esse ex definitione formae substantialis, quam F. Suarez proposuit, et ex ipsius argumentis a priori pro ea. Hoc quidem argumentum Cartesianum non nisi polemicam vim habere videtur, nam Cartesius potius ex superioritate explanationum mechanicarum a se percepta formas substantiales impugnavit. Tamen ipsum factum, Cartesium scil. in doctrinamSuarezianam de forma substantiali incurrisse, doctrinae Suarezianae auctoritatem et famam contestatur. Aliis verbis, Descartes sane demonstrationem, qua Suarezii argumenta ad absurdum reducentur, maiori momenti esse exspectavit quam argumentationem contra doctrinam Thomisticam de forma substantiali. Secundo ostendo definitionem Suarezianam formae substantialis novam conceptionem causalitatis formalis exegisse. Suarez causalitatem formalem ad modum unionis formae substantiali cum materia limitavit, quo pacto vim eius in philosophia naturali diminuit significantiamque causarum materialis ac efficientis in nova philosophia mechanistica anticipavit. Hoc modo serior metaphysica scholastica indirecte velut dispositionem fundamentalem praebuit ad rerum naturalium explanationes mechanisticas recipiendas ac sustinendas.In this paper I first show that Descartes’ a priori argument against substantial forms is properly understood against the background of Suárez’s definition of and a priori arguments for the substantial form. Even though Descartes’ a priori argument appears to have only a polemical value since his own path to the elimination of substantial forms was based on the perceived superiority of mechanical explanations, the fact that Descartes targeted Suárez’s account of the substantial form in his polemical argument bears witness to its widespread influence. In other words, Descartes expected that a proof that reduced Suárez’s argument to absurdity would have a greater impact than an argument directed against Aquinas’ account of substantial forms. Secondly, I show that Suárez’s definition of the substantial form prompted a reconceptualization of the role of formal causality. Suárez limits formal causality to the mode of union between the substantial form and matter, thus deemphasizing its importance to natural philosophical explanations and anticipating the emphasis on material and efficient causes typical of the new mechanical philosophy. In this indirect manner, late Scholastic metaphysics provided a general framework in which mechanical explanations of natural phenomena could find a place and take hold.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1214-8407
DOI studneoar20118212
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,649
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Suárez and Descartes.Helen Hattab - 2011 - Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (2):143-162.
Francis Suárez on the Efficiency of Substantial Forms.Mauricio Lecón - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):107-124.
Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms (Review).Steven Nadler - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):399-400.
Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms.Helen Hattab - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Suárez's Last Stand for the Substantial Form.Helen Hattab - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
The Substantial Unity of Material Substances.John Douglas Kronen - 1990 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Suárez on Material Substance: Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites.'.Daniel Heider - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (4):423-38.
Dieu Trompeur, Mauvais Génie Et Origine de l'Erreur Selon Descartes Et Suarez.Emmanuel Faye - 2001 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (1):61 - 72.
Descartes’ Idea and the Representations of Things.Predrag Milidrag - 2011 - Filozofija I Društvo 22 (3):235-266.
Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suarez.Norman J. Wells - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (1):25-50.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-16

Total views
12 ( #621,022 of 2,242,383 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #500,338 of 2,242,383 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature