Perspectives on Science 8 (2):93-118 (2000)
: In this paper I address the vexed question of secondary causation in René Descartes' physics, and examine several influential interpretations, especially the one recently proposed by Dennis Des Chene. I argue that interpreters who regard Cartesian bodies as real secondary causes, on the grounds that the modes of body include real forces, contradict Descartes' account of modes. On the other hand, those who deny that Descartes affirms secondary causation, on the grounds that forces cannot be modes of extension, commit Descartes to the problematic view that the undetermined and immutable will of God is the sole cause of determinate and variable motions. Des Chene's contextualist approach to Descartes' texts leads him to an intermediate position that combines elements of both interpretations. However, in my view, Des Chene's interpretation likewise fails to resolve apparent tensions in Descartes' claims. I thus propose to separate the issue of secondary causation from what Des Chene dubs 'the problem of force'. On the basis of this approach, and a study of Jesuit commentaries familiar to Descartes, I develop a new interpretation which takes seriously Descartes' claim that the laws of nature are the secondary and particular causes of particular motions and changes in motion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Principles of Philosophy.René Descartes, Valentine Rodger Miller & Reese P. Miller - 1983 - Reidel Distributed by Kluwer Boston, C1983.
Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought.Dennis Des Chene - 1996 - Cornell University Press.
Force (God) in Descartes' Physics.Gary C. Hatfield - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (2):113-140.
Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton.Alan Gabbey - 1980 - In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Barnes & Noble. pp. 230--320.
The Search After Truth.Nicholas Malebranche, Thomas M. Lennon & Paul J. Olscamp - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):146-147.
Citations of this work BETA
The Metaphysics of Rest in Descartes and Malebranche.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (1):21-40.
Supernaturalism, Occasionalism, and Preformation in Malebranche.Karen Detlefsen - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (4):443-483.
Similar books and articles
Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion.Edward Slowik - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.
Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (Review).Dennis des Chene - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):113-115.
Descartes Reinvented (Review).Dennis des Chene - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):498-499.
Life After Descartes: Regis on Generation.Chene Dennis Des - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
Cartesian Causation: Continuous, Instantaneous, Overdetermined.Geoffrey Gorham - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):389-423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #149,141 of 2,143,902 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,613 of 2,143,902 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.