Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):41-47 (1995)
Hauser defends the proposition that our languages of thought are public languages. One group of arguments points to the coincidence of clearly productive (novel, unbounded) cognitive competence with overt possession of recursive symbol systems. Another group relies on phenomenological experience. A third group cites practical and methodological considerations: Occam's razor and the "streetlight principle" (other things being equal, look under the lamp) that motivate looking for instantiations of outer languages in thought first
|Keywords||Epistemology Natural Language Psychology Thought Abbott, B Hauser, L|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness.Christopher D. Viger - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (3):313-25.
Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness.Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
Because Mere Calculating Isn't Thinking: Comments on Hauser's Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?.William J. Rapaport - 1993 - Minds and Machines 3 (1):11-20.
I Don't Think So: Pinker on the Mentalese Monopoly.David J. Cole - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (3):283-295.
Natural Language and Thought: Thinking in English.Barbara Abbott - 1995 - Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):49-55.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #167,434 of 2,177,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,205 of 2,177,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?