Ordinary devices: Reply to Bringsjord's Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 10 (1):115-117 (2000)
What Robots Can and Can't Be (hereinafter Robots) is, as Selmer Bringsjord says "intended to be a collection of formal-arguments-that-border-on-proofs for the proposition that in all worlds, at all times, machines can't be minds" (Bringsjord, forthcoming). In his (1994) "Précis of What Robots Can and Can't Be" Bringsjord styles certain of these arguments as proceeding "repeatedly . . . through instantiations of" the "simple schema"
|Keywords||Computation Logic Robot Science Bringsjord, S|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind.Selmer Bringsjord & Alexander Bringsjord - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):301-305.
The Impact of Computing on Epistemology: Knowing Gödel's Mind Through Computation.Selmer Bringsjord - unknown
People Are Infinitary Symbol Systems: No Sensorimotor Capacity Necessary.Selmer Bringsjord - manuscript
Reply to Glymour and Thayse.Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):313-315.
On Building Robot Persons: Response to Zlatev. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):381-385.
Superman and the Duck/Rabbit: A Reply to Gordon and Bringsjord.Andy Clark - 1988 - Analysis 48 (1):54-57.
Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):111-113.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #154,763 of 2,163,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?