Sympathy, commitment, and preference

Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While very much in Sen's camp in rejecting revealed preference theory and emphasizing the complexity, incompleteness, and context dependence of preference and the intellectual costs of supposing that all the factors influencing choice can be captured by a single notion of preference, this essay contests his view that economists should recognize multiple notions of preference. It argues that Sen's concerns are better served by embracing a single conception of preference and insisting on the need for analysis of the multiple factors that determine ‘preference’ so conceived.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom, preference and autonomy.Keith Lehrer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):3-25.
A logical analysis of the relationship between commitment and obligation.Churn-Jung Liau - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):237-261.
Pure time preference.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
Reasons for the preference for symmetry.Rolf Reber - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):415-416.
An Extended Framework for Preference Relations.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2011 - Economics and Philosophy 27 (3):360-367.
Revealed preference, belief, and game theory.Daniel M. Hausman - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):99-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
124 (#146,973)

6 months
20 (#133,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Hausman
University of Wisconsin, Madison

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references