Authors
Michael Hauskeller
University of Liverpool
Abstract
Famously, Bernard Williams has argued that although death is an evil if it occurs when we still have something to live for, we have no good reason to desire that our lives be radically extended because any such life would at some point reach a stage when we become indifferent to the world and ourselves. This is supposed to be so bad for us that it would be better if we died before that happens. Most critics have rejected Williams’ arguments on the grounds that it is far from certain that we will run out of things to live for, and I don't contest these objections. Instead, I am trying to show that they do not affect the persuasiveness of Williams’ argument, which in my reading does not rely on the claim that we will inevitably run out of things to live for, but on the far less contentious claim that it is not unthinkable we will do so and the largely ignored claim that if that happens, we will have died too late.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1358246121000278
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meaningfulness and Time.Antti Kauppinen - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):345-377.
The Misfortunes of the Dead.George Pitcher - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (2):183 - 188.
Immortality and Boredom.John Martin Fischer & Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):353-372.
Infinity Goes Up on Trial: Must Immortality Be Meaningless?Timothy Chappell - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):30-44.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aging, Death, and the Ethics of Life Extending Technologies.Rosa Rantanen - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 64:73-77.
Motivations for Pursuing Radical Life Extension.Lucinda April Campbell - 2020 - Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington
Forever Young? Life Extension and the Ageing Mind.Michael Hauskeller - 2011 - Ethical Perspectives 18 (3):385-405.
The Metaphysics of Death.John Martin Fischer (ed.) - 1993 - Stanford University Press.
The Hope of Meaningful Immortality.Adam Buben - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Research 46:89-103.
Is Considerable Life Extension an Enhancement?R. Rantanen - 2014 - Global Bioethics 25 (2):103-113.
Life After Death and the Devastation of the Grave.Eric T. Olson - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 409-423.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-03

Total views
7 ( #1,067,034 of 2,504,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,243 of 2,504,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes