In Quaestiones 1.3 and 2.14, Alexander presents a distinctly realist or essentialist view of the objects of definition, distinguished, on the one hand, from two types of realism rejected by Aristotle, and, on the other, from two types of conceptualism that probably belong within the Peripatetic tradition. The difference between Alexander’s view and essentialist abstractivism lies in his understanding of definienda not as the common concepts of things existing in the particulars, but as the common things conceived of as existing in the particulars. This paper offers a close reading of Quaest. 1.3, whose aim is to flesh out Alexander’s position vis-à-vis the objects of definition against the backdrop of the four rejected alternatives. The distinction between Alexander’s essentialism and the essentialist abstractivist notion of definienda is further explained in light of Quaest. 2.14. The amended Greek text of Quaest. 1.3 is appended with an English translation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/elen-2021-0018
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals.Victor Caston - 1999 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17:145-213.
Porphyry Introduction. Porphyry & Jonathan Barnes - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
The Stoic Theory of Universals.David Sedley - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (S1):87-92.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Quaestiones: 1.1-2.15.Alexander of Aphrodisias - 1992 - Cornell University Press.
Quaestiones in secundum librum sententiarum : Quaestiones 13-27. [REVIEW]Alice Lamy - 2011 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 136 (4):564-565.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,546,279 of 2,507,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes