Critical Notice of Every Thing Must Go

Metascience 19 (2):174-179 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This is a critical notice of Ladyman and Ross et al's Every Thing Must Go. I argue that they mischaracterise much of so-called 'analytic metaphysics', and that they could have usefully drawn upon the resources of current metaphysics in order to articulate their own views more clearly. The piece appears in a symposium which also includes contributions by Kyle Stanford and Paul Humphreys, with responses from Ladyman and Ross



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

178 (#69,999)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherine Hawley
PhD: Cambridge University; Last affiliation: University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Structuralism in the Idiom of Determination.Kerry McKenzie - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):497-522.
Neo-Positivist Metaphysics.Alyssa Ney - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):53-78.
No Two Entities Without Identity.Benjamin C. Jantzen - 2011 - Synthese 181 (3):433-450.
Inductive Social Metaphysics—A Defence of Inference to the Best Explanation in the Metaphysics of Social Reality: Comments on Katherine Hawley.Oliver R. Scholz - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (2):199-210.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaontology.Matti Eklund - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (3):317-334.

Add more references