Chopping Up Gunk

The Monist 87 (3):339-50 (2004)
Abstract
We show that someone who believes in both gunk and the possibility of supertasks has to give up either a plausible principle about where gunk can be located, or plausible conservation principles
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist200487316
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Simples and Gunk.Hud Hudson - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):291–302.
Receptacles.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):427–451.
Anaxagoras’s Qualitative Gunk.Anna Marmodoro - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (3):402-422.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Simples and Gunk.Hud Hudson - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):291–302.
Grit or Gunk.Peter Forrest - 2004 - The Monist 87 (3):351-370.
Stoic Gunk.Daniel Nolan - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (2):162-183.
Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):241 - 250.
Identity, Quantification, and Number.Eric T. Olson - 2012 - In T. Tahko (ed.), Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 66-82.
Illusions of Gunk.J. R. G. Williams - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):493–513.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
153 ( #34,901 of 2,225,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #33,016 of 2,225,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature