For whom the bell arguments toll

Synthese 102 (1):99-138 (1995)
Abstract
We will formulate two Bell arguments. Together they show that if the probabilities given by quantum mechanics are approximately correct, then the properties exhibited by certain physical systems must be nontrivially dependent on thetypes of measurements performedand eithernonlocally connected orholistically related to distant events. Although a number of related arguments have appeared since John Bell's original paper (1964), they tend to be either highly technical or to lack full generality. The following arguments depend on the weakest of premises, and the structure of the arguments is simpler than most (without any loss of rigor or generality). The technical simplicity is due in part to a novel version of the generalized Bell inequality. The arguments are self contained and presuppose no knowledge of quantum mechanics. We will also offer a Dutch Book argument for measurement type dependence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01063901
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Search for Ontological Emergence.Michael Silberstein & J. McGeever - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (195):182-200.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

241 ( #13,426 of 2,146,924 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #17,156 of 2,146,924 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums