For whom the bell arguments toll

Synthese 102 (1):99-138 (1995)
Authors
Abstract
We will formulate two Bell arguments. Together they show that if the probabilities given by quantum mechanics are approximately correct, then the properties exhibited by certain physical systems must be nontrivially dependent on thetypes of measurements performedand eithernonlocally connected orholistically related to distant events. Although a number of related arguments have appeared since John Bell's original paper (1964), they tend to be either highly technical or to lack full generality. The following arguments depend on the weakest of premises, and the structure of the arguments is simpler than most (without any loss of rigor or generality). The technical simplicity is due in part to a novel version of the generalized Bell inequality. The arguments are self contained and presuppose no knowledge of quantum mechanics. We will also offer a Dutch Book argument for measurement type dependence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01063901
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,086
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Search for Ontological Emergence.Michael Silberstein & J. McGeever - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):182-200.
The Search for Ontological Emergence.Michael Silberstein & John Mcgeever - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):201-214.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
253 ( #20,337 of 2,313,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #161,796 of 2,313,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature