Cognitive Science 38 (4):701-735 (2014)

Abstract
Discrete choice experiments—selecting the best and/or worst from a set of options—are increasingly used to provide more efficient and valid measurement of attitudes or preferences than conventional methods such as Likert scales. Discrete choice data have traditionally been analyzed with random utility models that have good measurement properties but provide limited insight into cognitive processes. We extend a well-established cognitive model, which has successfully explained both choices and response times for simple decision tasks, to complex, multi-attribute discrete choice data. The fits, and parameters, of the extended model for two sets of choice data (involving patient preferences for dermatology appointments, and consumer attitudes toward mobile phones) agree with those of standard choice models. The extended model also accounts for choice and response time data in a perceptual judgment task designed in a manner analogous to best–worst discrete choice experiments. We conclude that several research fields might benefit from discrete choice experiments, and that the particular accumulator-based models of decision making used in response time research can also provide process-level instantiations for random utility models
Keywords Best–worst scaling  Preference  Random utility model  Decision making  Evidence accumulation  Linear ballistic accumulator
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12094
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Theory of Memory Retrieval.Roger Ratcliff - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (2):59-108.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Discrete Dynamic Choice: An Extension of the Choice Models of Thurstone and Luce.John Dagsvik - 1983 - I Kommisjon Hos H. Aschehoug Og Universitetsforlaget.
Dynamic Choice Mechanisms.Ludwig von Auer - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):295-312.
The Construction of Preference.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Contextual Choice and Other Models of Preference.James E. Mazur - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):108-109.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-11

Total views
22 ( #482,305 of 2,433,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,411 of 2,433,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes