On mill, infallibility, and freedom of expression

Res Publica 13 (1):77-100 (2007)
Philosophers have tended to dismiss John Stuart Mill’s claim that ‘all silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility’. I argue that Mill’s ‘infallibility claim’ is indeed open to many objections, but that, contrary to the consensus, those objections fail to defeat the anti-authoritarian thesis which lies at its core. I then argue that Mill’s consequentialist case for the liberty of thought and discussion is likewise capable of withstanding some familiar objections. My purpose is to suggest that Mill’s anti-authoritarianism and his faith in thought and discussion, when taken seriously, supply the basis for a ‘public interest’ account of ‘freedom of expression as the liberty of thought and discussion’ which is faithful to Mill in spirit, if not to the precise letter. I outline such an account, which – as I say in conclusion – can serve as a valuable safeguard against ad hoc, reactive legislation, and the demands of a spurious communitarianism.
Keywords free speech  freedom of expression  thought and discussion  J. S. Mill: On Liberty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-006-9016-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: A Millian Response.Alexander Brown - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism.Alan E. Fuchs - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Getting Mill Right.Deni Elliott - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):100 – 112.
Mill on Liberty.Ted Honderich - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I).H. J. McCloskey - 1970 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Rational Freedom in John Stuart Mill's Feminism.Maria Morales - 2007 - In Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.), J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):407.
Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Was Mill a Liberal?Chin-Liew Ten - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II).D. H. Monro - 1970 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):238 – 253.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

102 ( #50,157 of 2,177,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,027 of 2,177,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums