On the compatibility of connectionist and classical models

Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):5-16 (1989)
Abstract
This paper presents considerations in favour of the view that traditional (classical) architectures can be seen as emergent features of connectionist networks with distributed representation. A recent paper by William Bechtel (1988) which argues for a similar conclusion is unsatisfactory in that it fails to consider whether the compositional syntax and semantics attributed to mental representations by classical models can emerge within a connectionist network. The compatibility of the two paradigms hinges largely, I suggest, on how this question is answered. Focusing on the issue of syntax, I argue that while such structure is lacking in connectionist models with local representation, it can be accommodated within networks where representation is distributed. I discuss an important paper by Smolenski (1988) which attempts to show how connectionists can incorporate the relevant syntactic structure, suggesting that some criticisms levelled against that paper by Fodor & Pylyshyn (1988) are wanting. I then go on to indicate a strategy by which a compositional syntax and semantics can be defined for the sort of network that Smolenski describes. I conclude that since the connectionist can respect the central tenets of classicism, the two approaches are compatible with one another.
Keywords Cognitive  Connectionism  Language  Smolenski, P
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515088908572956
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,404
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Connectionism Isn't Magic.Hugh Clapin - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (2):167-84.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #192,197 of 2,226,006 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #252,229 of 2,226,006 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature