Why Even a Liberal Can Justify Limited Paternalistic Intervention in Anorexia Nervosa

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 28 (2):155-158 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most adult persons with anorexia satisfy the existing criteria widely used to assess decision-making capacity, meaning that incapacity typically cannot be used to justify coercive intervention. After rejecting two other approaches to justification, Professor Radden concludes that it is most likely not possible to justify coercive medical intervention for persons with anorexia in liberal terms, though she leaves it open whether some other framework might succeed. I shall assume here that the standard approach to assessing decisionmaking capacity is adequate.1 The question then is whether we can justify—within a liberal framework—coercive intervention with the decision of a competent...

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Passion and Decision-Making Capacity in Anorexia Nervosa.Louis Christian Charland - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):66-68.
“Terminal Anorexia”, Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity.Anneli Jefferson - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (4):558-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-03

Downloads
782 (#33,870)

6 months
135 (#40,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

The values and rules of capacity assessments.Binesh Hass - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11):816-820.

Add more citations