After Albert Camus's Fall: Reframing Post-Colonial Criticism

Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of this work is to cause its readers to question post-colonial criticism of Camus. Initially, attention will be directed to the work of Conor Cruise O'Brien, who first presented Camus within the post-colonial frame. Embarrassingly uncomplimentary, Albert Camus of Europe and Africa presented Camus's work in such a way that he could not walk away from the "Algerian Question" uncompromised. Without fully committing himself, O'Brien strongly suggests that, for instance, Meursault killed an Arab because he was French. Camus criticism has not been the same since this position was articulated. ;Chapter one attempts to trace the genesis of anti-Camus criticism, which became notoriously strident following the publication of L'homme revolte . Chapter one proceeds from the assertion that after Camus went to war with Sartre, criticism of the former became increasingly gratuitous and less substantive. Opposed to the conclusions of critics such as O'Brien and Said, the following chapters attempt to defend Camus by calling attention to two sustained, redeeming strains in his work. ;Chapter two focuses upon Camus's commitment to standing as a historical witness. Both the concepts of "commitment" and "witnessing" are central here. Confirmation of Camus's commitment to witnessing is found in Shoshana Felman's Testimony: Crises in Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, in which it is maintained that Camus was the first Western figure to break the Allied silence regarding the Holocaust. Building upon Felman's work, it is argued that many of the most disturbing elements of Camus's work further attest to the trauma of the colonial condition. ;The third and final chapter turns to Camus's treatment of the figure of the scapegoat. Ever attentive to the downtrodden, Camus's work instinctively attends to those victimized for their marginal status. That is, to society's scapegoats. Accordingly chapter three defends Camus against the claims of post-colonial critics by calling attention to his lifelong preoccupation with the victims of systemic power. Ultimately it is argued that in Camus's estimation all human sacrifices, even those made in the name of the greater good, represent unacceptable losses

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Trial of Albert Camus.Russell Grigg - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):593-602.
Albert Camus as Ethical Fallibilist.David Lee Stegall - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Camus le méditerranéen, Camus l'ancien.François Bousquet - 1977 - Sherbrooke, Québec: Éditions Naaman.
Albert Camus: philosopher and littérateur.Joseph McBride - 1992 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Justice or Freedom Camus's Aporia.Annabel Herzog - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (2):188-199.
Albert Camus and Rebellious Cosmopolitanism in a Divided Worlda.Patrick Hayden - 2013 - Journal of International Political Theory 9 (2):194-219.
Levinasian Ethics and the Works of Albert Camus.Elizabeth Jane Hart - 1997 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references