In Pieranna Garavaso (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Academic Feminism. London, UK: pp. 483-506 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Coming more than a decade after I first argued that people who are oppressed have an obligation to resist their oppression, this paper expands the implications of the original account and connects it up to some of the important contemporary work published in oppression studies in the interim. I then move on to respond to two critical objections to my view. The first objection charges that the typical severity of oppressive harms is not sufficiently great to ground a general obligation of resistance. The second objection charges that this project would do better to conceive of resistance in political, rather than moral, terms.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Understanding Oppression, Theorizing its Reproduction, & Forecasting its End.Surulola Eke - 2017 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 27 (1):89-101.
Prophylactic Neutrality, Oppression, and the Reverse Pascal's Wager.Simon R. Clarke - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (3):527-535.
Commercial Contract Pregnancy in India, Judgment, and Resistance to Oppression.Katy Fulfer - 2015 - Hypatia 30 (4):846-861.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-05-17
Total views
59 ( #191,239 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,467 of 2,498,932 )
2019-05-17
Total views
59 ( #191,239 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,467 of 2,498,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads