Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (2):123-127 (2013)

Abstract
Paul Hirst claimed that Richard Peters ?revolutionised philosophy of education?. This does not accord with my experience in the Antipodean periphery. My experience of the work of Wittgenstein, Austin and Kovesi before reading Peters and Dewey, Kuhn and Toulmin subsequently meant that Peters was a major but not revolutionary figure in my understanding of philosophy of education
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00131857.2012.752987
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
Ethics and Education.R. S. Peters - 1966 - London: Allen & Unwin.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

PESA Archives: The Social Histories of Philosophy of Education.Margaret Joan Stuart - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (10):1006-1013.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
20 ( #534,953 of 2,446,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,908 of 2,446,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes