Higher-Order Epistemic Attitudes and Intellectual Humility

Episteme 9 (3):205-223 (2012)
Abstract
This paper concerns would-be necessary connections between doxastic attitudes about the epistemic statuses of your doxastic attitudes, or, and the epistemic statuses of those doxastic attitudes. I will argue that, in some situations, it can be reasonable for a person to believe p and to suspend judgment about whether believing p is reasonable for her. This will set the stage for an account of the virtue of intellectual humility, on which humility is a matter of your higher-order epistemic attitudes. Recent discussions in the epistemology of disagreement have assumed that the question of the proper response to disagreement about p concerns whether you ought to change your doxastic attitude towards p. My conclusion here suggests an alternative approach, on which the question of the proper response to disagreement about p concerns the proper doxastic attitude to adopt concerning the epistemic status of your doxastic attitude towards p.
Keywords agnosticism  epistemic akrasia  higher-order doubts or evidence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2012.11
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Higher-Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
Must We Know What We Say?Matthew Weiner - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.
Epistemology Futures.Stephen Cade Hetherington (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Knowing and Asserting.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):489.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Akrasia.Sophie Horowitz - 2014 - Noûs 48 (4):718-744.
The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.Alex Worsnip - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2).
Respecting All the Evidence.Paulina Sliwa & Sophie Horowitz - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (11):2835-2858.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Doxastic Disagreement.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (1):121-142.
The Case for Rational Uniqueness.Jonathan Matheson - 2011 - Logic and Episteme 2 (3):359-373.
(More) Springs of My Discontent.Guy Axtell - 2012 - Logos and Episteme (1):131-137.
An Essay on Doxastic Agency.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Rochester
Conciliatory Views of Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence.Jonathan Matheson - 2009 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 6 (3):269-279.
Expressivism and Convention-Relativism About Epistemic Discourse.Allan Hazlett - forthcoming - In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Ought to Believe.Matthew Chrisman - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (7):346-370.
Reflection, Disagreement, and Context.Edward Hinchman - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):95.
Epistemic Duties and Failure to Understand One's Evidence.Scott Stapleford - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):147-177.
On Believing That I Am Thinking.Tom Stoneham - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):125-44.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-30

Total downloads

779 ( #1,226 of 2,171,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

74 ( #2,195 of 2,171,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums