In M. Berhow, G. Petersen & G. Tsakiridis (eds.), Engaging Populism: Democracy and the Intellectual Virtues. Palgrave (forthcoming)

Allan Hazlett
Washington University in St. Louis
Populism, as I shall understand the term here, is a style of political rhetoric that posits a Manichean conflict between the people and corrupt elites. In the present decade, populism has played a particularly salient role in the politics of the United States and Europe. Moreover, populism is commonly associated with a kind of skepticism about expertise, on which the opinions of non- experts are to be preferred to any expert consensus. In light of all this, populist expertise skepticism appears to be a kind of pathology of excessive intellectual autonomy. I shall argue, however, that this connection between populism and intellectual autonomy is mere appearance: populist expertise skepticism does not involve excessive intellectual autonomy, because it does not involve a disposition for non-deferential belief, but rather a disposition for deference to “alternative” sources of information.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Trespassing.Nathan Ballantyne - 2019 - Mind 128 (510):367-395.
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others.Richard Foley - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paradoxes of Populism During the Pandemic.Rogers Brubaker - 2021 - Thesis Eleven 164 (1):73-87.
Some Notes on ‘Populism’.Jon Elster - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (5):591-600.
Reflections on the Nature of Populism and the Problem of Stability.David Rasmussen - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (9-10):1058-1068.
A Family Affair: Populism, Technocracy, and Political Epistemology.Kevin J. Elliott - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1-3):85-102.
Trend of Populism in Modern Political Process.O. Novakova - 2017 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 35 (1):137-145.
Populism and Populistic Democracy.Byung-Hoon Suh - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 72:145-152.
Expertise and the Fragmentation of Intellectual Autonomy.C. Thi Nguyen - 2018 - Philosophical Inquiries 6 (2):107-124.
What Can We Hold Against Populism?Fabio Wolkenstein - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (2):111-129.
How Can Political Liberalism Respond to Contemporary Populism?Andrew Reid - 2020 - European Journal of Political Theory:147488512091130.
Populism, Liberal Democracy and the Ethics of Peoplehood.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (3):330-348.
Populism as a Political Science Category.I. Kiyanka - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1:67-75.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #260,625 of 2,463,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #21,079 of 2,463,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes