Authors
Tomas Hribek
Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Donald Davidson and John Searle famously differ, among other things, on the issue of animal thoughts. Davidson seems to be a latter-day Cartesian, denying any propositional thought to subhuman animals, while Searle seems to follow Hume in claiming that if we have thoughts, then animals do, too. Davidson’s argument centers on the idea that language is necessary for thought, which Searle rejects. The paper argues two things. Firstly, Searle eventually argues that much of a more complex thought does depend on language, which reduces a distance between himself and Davidson. Secondly, some of Davidson’s suggestions are promising – in particular the idea that we may lack a vocabulary to capture the contents of animal thoughts. Based on this insight, one might, pace Davidson, grant thoughts to animals. However, this does not mean, pace Searle, that it should be possible to construe even the simplest of such thoughts as propositional. Perhaps we need to move beyond Davidson and Searle by developing a theory of nonpropositional thought for animals.
Keywords Donald Davidson  John Searle  animal minds  semantic holism  de re/de dicto  triangulation  non-propositional thought
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford University Press.

View all 140 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant on Descartes and the Brutes.Steve Naragon - 1990 - Kant-Studien 81 (1):1-23.
A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes.Peder Anker - 2004 - Philosophy and Geography 7 (2):259 – 264.
A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes (1792).Thomas Taylor - 1792 - Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.
Speechless Brutes.John Heil - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (3):400-406.
Religious Identity in the Public Square.Paul D. Hanson - 2010 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 64 (3):258-268.
Thoughtless Brutes.Norman Malcolm - 1972 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 46 (September):5-20.
An Essay on the Future Life of Brutes, Introduced with Observation Upon Evil, its Nature and Origin.Richard Dean - 1713 - In Aaron Garrett, Richard Dean, Humphrey Primatt, John Oswald & Thomas Young (eds.), Animal Rights and Souls in the Eighteenth Century. Thoemmes Press.
Thoughtful Brutes.Jonathan Bennett - 1988 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 62:197.
Thoreauvian Patriotism as an Environmental Virtue.Philip Cafaro - 1995 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (2):1-7.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-13

Total views
328 ( #20,708 of 2,326,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
102 ( #4,886 of 2,326,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes