Business Ethics and the 'End of History' in Corporate Law

Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):5-20 (2011)
Henry Hansmann has claimed we have reached the “end of history” in corporate law, organized around the “widespread normative consensus that corporate managers should act exclusively in the economic interests of shareholders.” In this paper, I examine Hansmann’s own argument in support of this view, in order to draw out its implications for some of the traditional concerns of business ethicists about corporate social responsibility. The centerpiece of Hansmann’s argument is the claim that ownership of the firm is most naturally exercised by the group able to achieve the lowest agency costs, and that homogeneity of interest within the ownership group is the most important factor in achieving lower costs. He defends this claim through a study of cooperatives, attempting to show that homogeneity is the source of the competitive advantage most often enjoyed by shareholders over other constituency groups, such as workers, suppliers and customers, when it comes to exercising control over the firm. Some business ethicists, impressed by this argument, have taken it to be a vindication of Milton Friedman’s claim that profit-maximization is the only “social responsibility” of management. I would like to suggest that this conclusion does not follow, and that the “Hansmann argument” lends itself to a less minimalist view, what I refer to as a “market failures” approach to business ethics
Keywords Shareholder primacy  Cooperatives  Ownership  Henry Hansmann  Efficiency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1192-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,488
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
R. Edward Freeman (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Joseph Heath (2006). Business Ethics Without Stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):533-558.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Hasko von Kriegstein (2015). Shareholder Primacy and Deontology. Business and Society Review 120 (3):465-490.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jiyun Wu & Kirk Davidson (2010). How Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics Are Perceived in China. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:23-31.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #409,413 of 1,925,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,701 of 1,925,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.