Idealistic Studies 18 (3):266-274 (1988)
Against blanshard's classic argument for coherence, i maintain that coherence is neither the sole criterion nor nature of truth. in the face of blanshard's insistence that, since truth cannot be a matter of correspondence it must necessarily be a matter of coherence, i propose and defend a third option which combines the two polar positions. i develop this option through analysis of kant's writings on truth
|Keywords||Continental Philosophy History of Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Blanshard, Rescher, and the Coherence Theory of Truth.Scott D. Palmer - 1982 - Idealistic Studies 12 (3):211-230.
Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification.J. Olsson Erik - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.Paul Thagard - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (1):28-47.
Probability, Evidence, and the Coherence of the Whole Truth.Charles B. Cross - 1995 - Synthese 103 (2):153 - 170.
The Incoherence of Coherence Theories.Richard Fumerton - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:89-102.
On the Alleged Impossibility of Coherence.Wouter Meijs & Igor Douven - 2007 - Synthese 157 (3):347 - 360.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads35 ( #147,642 of 2,171,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,676 of 2,171,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?