Platonism and metaphor in the texts of mathematics: Gödel and Frege on mathematical knowledge [Book Review]

Man and World 30 (4):453-481 (1997)

Authors
Clevis R. Headley
Florida Atlantic University
Abstract
In this paper, I challenge those interpretations of Frege that reinforce the view that his talk of grasping thoughts about abstract objects is consistent with Russell's notion of acquaintance with universals and with Gödel's contention that we possess a faculty of mathematical perception capable of perceiving the objects of set theory. Here I argue the case that Frege is not an epistemological Platonist in the sense in which Gödel is one. The contention advanced is that Gödel bases his Platonism on a literal comparison between mathematical intuition and physical perception. He concludes that since we accept sense perception as a source of empirical knowledge, then we similarly should posit a faculty of mathematical intuition to serve as the source of mathematical knowledge. Unlike Gödel, Frege does not posit a faculty of mathematical intuition. Frege talks instead about grasping thoughts about abstract objects. However, despite his hostility to metaphor, he uses the notion of ‘grasping’ as a strategic metaphor to model his notion of thinking, i.e., to underscore that it is only by logically manipulating the cognitive content of mathematical propositions that we can obtain mathematical knowledge. Thus, he construes ‘grasping’ more as theoretical activity than as a kind of inner mental ‘seeing’.
Keywords Philosophy   Phenomenology   Philosophy of Man   Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1023/A:1004240918740
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Mathematical Objects.Øystein Linnebo - 2008 - In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. pp. 205--219.
Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge.Mark Colyvan - 2007 - In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 109--122.
Fictionalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.Mark Balaguer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Truth and Proof.Otávio Bueno - 2008 - Manuscrito 31 (1):419-440.
Kitcher and Frege on A Priori Knowledge.Christoph C. Pfisterer - 2010 - Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 94:29-43.
A Platonist Epistemology.Mark Balaguer - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.
The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge: An Open World View.Carlo Cellucci - 2000 - In Emily Grosholz & Herbert Breger (eds.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, pp. 153-176. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 153--176.
Problems with Profligate Platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):164-177.
Getting in Touch with Numbers: Intuition and Mathematical Platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):111-125.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
41 ( #222,117 of 2,291,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #581,637 of 2,291,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature