Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-enron era?
Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):247-265 (2004)
This paper raises a challenge for those who assume that corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance naturally go hand-in-hand. The recent spate of corporate scandals in the United States and elsewhere has dramatized, once again, the severity of the agency problems that may arise between managers and shareholders. These scandals remind us that even if we adopt an extremely narrow concept of managerial responsibility – such that we recognize no social responsibility beyond the obligation to maximize shareholder value – there may still be very serious difficulties associated with the effective institutionalization of this obligation. It also suggests that if we broaden managerial responsibility, in order to include extensive responsibilities to various other stakeholder groups, we may seriously exacerbate these agency problems, making it even more difficult to impose effective discipline upon managers. Hence, our central question: is a strong commitment to corporate social responsibility institutionally feasible? In searching for an answer, we revisit the history of public management, and in particular, the experience of social-democratic governments during the 1960s and 1970s, and their attempts to impose social responsibility upon the managers of nationalized industries. The results of this inquiry are less than encouraging for proponents of corporate social responsibility. In fact, the history of public-sector management presents a number of stark warnings, which we would do well to heed if we wish to reconcile robust social responsibility with effective corporate governance.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management.Claude Francoeur, Réal Labelle & Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):83-95.
Business Ethics as Self-Regulation: Why Principles That Ground Regulations Should Be Used to Ground Beyond-Compliance Norms as Well. [REVIEW]Wayne Norman - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):43-57.
Business and the Polis: What Does It Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors? [REVIEW]Pierre-Yves Néron - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):333-352.
The Contained-Rivalry Requirement and a 'Triple Feature' Program for Business Ethics.Dominic Martin - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1):167-182.
Corporate Constructed and Dissent Enabling Public Spheres: Differentiating Dissensual From Consensual Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW]Glen Whelan - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4):755-769.
Similar books and articles
Third Way CR and Third World CR.Loke Min Foo - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:35-53.
Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. [REVIEW]Jacquie L'Etang - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
Market Positioning and Corporate Responsibility.Ashok P. Ranchhod & Patricia Park - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):175-191.
Corporate Citizenship: How to Strengthen the Social Responsibility of Managers? [REVIEW]Kor Grit - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):97-106.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the State of the Art in Rwanda.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #45,315 of 2,158,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,044 of 2,158,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?