The Metaphysician Who Didn’t Know That He Was Dreaming: Kant and the Spirit-Seers

In Violetta L. Waibel, Margit Ruffing & David Wagner (eds.), Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. De Gruyter. pp. 867-874 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant’s Dreams of a Spirit Seer has puzzled most of its readers since its publication in 1766. Herder complained in general terms about the lack of unity and coherence of the book as well as Kant’s dialectical method of presenting both sides of a problem without offering his own solution. Mendelssohn was in doubt about whether Kant wanted to ridicule metaphysics or make a case for Swedenborg’s visions. Another exegetical puzzle has not been noted yet: Dreams discusses not one, but three different versions of a ‘metaphysics of spirits’. All of them are mutually incompatible. In other words, the two versions of a metaphysics of spirits that Kant criticises in the first part of the book are both of them different from Swedenborg’s own claims, as they are discussed in the second part. And the two versions discussed within the first part are not homogeneous, either: the metaphysics discussed in the first chapter of the first part (the ‘tangled knot’) and those that seem to form the foundation for the second chapter of the first part (the ‘fragment of occult philosophy’) are again incompatible. And neither of them fits with what Kant analyses as Swedenborg’s metaphysical position in the second part: The position of the ‘tangled knot’ can tentatively be labelled as ‘crypto-materialist’. Swedenborg’s own position is characterised in the text as ‘idealist’. The ‘fragment of occult philosophy’ in contrast is probably best described as ‘dualist’. If this diagnosis is correct, it reinforces Herder’s complaints about the lack of coherence of Dreams as well as Mendelssohn’s worry about its targets. And it adds the additional challenge to explain how there can be a ‘crypto-materialist’ metaphysics of spirit-seeing. I propose to weaken the impact of these problems by identifying a second target of Kant’s scorn in Dreams – a metaphysical position Kant could be sympathetic with as far as its fundamental intentions are concerned, but that draws his ire because of an equally comprehensive failure in the realisation of these intentions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: lectures on the philosophy of spirit 1827-8.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Robert R. Williams.
How does the dreaming brain explain the dreaming mind?John S. Antrobus - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):904-907.
Sosa on scepticism. [REVIEW]Jessica Brown - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):397--405.
A plea to stop dreaming about dreaming.Neil Gallagher - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (March):423-424.
Dreaming is not a non-conscious electrophysiologic state.J. F. Pagel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):984-988.
A Virtue Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):427-440.
Review: Sosa on Scepticism. [REVIEW]Jessica Brown - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):397 - 405.
Lucid dreaming: Evidence and methodology.Stephen LaBerge - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):962-964.
Fallibilism and Knowing That One Is Not Dreaming.Stephen Hetherington - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):83 - 102.
Dreaming has content and meaning not just form.Milton Kramer - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):959-961.
Rem sleep = dreaming: The never-ending story.Corrado Cavallero - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):916-917.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
17 (#872,959)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stefan Heßbrüggen-Walter
University of Münster (PhD)

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (4):647-702.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references