Regularities of the physical world and the absence of their internalization

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):608-617 (2001)
The notion of internalization put forth by Roger Shepard continues to be appealing and challenging. He suggests that we have internalized, during our evolutionary development, environmental regularities, or constraints. Internalization solves one of the hardest problems of perceptual psychology: the underspecification problem. That is the problem of how well-defined perceptual experience is generated from the often ambiguous and incomplete sensory stimulation. Yet, the notion of internalization creates new problems that may outweigh the solution of the underspecification problem. To support this claim, I first examine the concept of internalization, breaking it down into several distinct interpretations. These range from well-resolved dynamic regularities to ill-resolved statistical regularities. As a function of the interpretation the researcher selects, an empirical test of the internalization hypothesis may be straightforward or it may become virtually impossible. I then attempt to cover the range of interpretations by drawing on examples from different domains of visual event perception. Unfortunately, the experimental tests regarding most candidate regularities, such as gravitational acceleration, fail to support the concept of internalization. This suggests that narrow interpretations of the concept should be given up in favor of more abstract interpretations. However, the latter are not easily amenable to empirical testing. There is nonetheless a way to test these abstract interpretations by contrasting internalization with the opposite concept: externalization of body dynamics. I summarize evidence for such a projection of body constraints onto external objects. Based on the combined evidence of well-resolved and ill- resolved regularities, the value of the notion of internalization has to be reassessed. Key Words: event perception; evolution; internalization.
Keywords event perception   evolution   internalization
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X01000036
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,385
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Groups in Mind.David Hilbert & Nick Huggett - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):765-777.
Internalization: A Metaphor We Can Live Without.Michael Kubovy & William Epstein - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):618-625.
Evolutionary Internalized Regularities.Robert Schwartz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Internalized Constraints May Function as an Emulator.Margaret Wilson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):710-711.
Is Kinematic Geometry an Internalized Regularity?Dejan Todorovic - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):641-651.
Adaptation as Genetic Internalization.Adolf Heschl - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):673-674.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
17 ( #319,861 of 2,225,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,905 of 2,225,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature