Environmental Values 25 (4):427-442 (2016)

Authors
Trevor Hedberg
Ohio State University
Abstract
In Animal Ethics in Context, Clare Palmer tries to harmonise two competing approaches to animal ethics. One focuses on the morally relevant capacities that animals possess. The other is the Laissez-Faire Intuition (LFI): the claim that we have duties to assist domesticated animals but should (at least generally) leave wild animals alone. In this paper, I critique the arguments that Palmer offers in favour of the No-Contact LFI - the view that we have (prima facie) duties not to harm wild animals but no duties to assist them. I argue that Palmer's endorsement of the No-Contact LFI is unwarranted. Her arguments actually provide strong reasons to endorse what I call the Gradient View - a position that posits weak presumptive duties to assist wild animals that become stronger as our relations with the animals grow stronger.
Keywords Animals  Animal Ethics  Environmental Ethics  Laissez-Faire Intuition  Duties of Assistance
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3197/096327116x14661540759197
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

After Libertarianism: Rejoinder to Narveson, McCloskey, Flew, and Machan.Jeffrey Friedman - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):113-152.
Two Rhetorical Strategies of Laissez-Faire.Andy Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.
Are Free Markets the Cause of Financial Instability?Kevin Dowd - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):57-67.
Democratic Capitalism and Respect for the Value of Freedom.Waheed Hussain - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):280-293.
The Crisis of (Confidence in) Global Capitalism.Barry Eichengreen - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):69-85.
“The Free Market” and the Asian Crisis.Garett Jones - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):47-56.
Why Keynesianism Triumphed or, Could so Many Keynesians Have Been Wrong?Tyler Cowen - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):518-530.
Go Ahead and Let Him Try: A Plea for Egonomic Laissez‐Faire.Daniel B. Klein - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):3 – 20.
Benthamism, Laissez Faire, and Collectivism.Willson H. Coates - 1950 - Journal of the History of Ideas 11 (1/4):357.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-04

Total views
145 ( #81,933 of 2,519,810 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #66,535 of 2,519,810 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes