Believing and Acting: Voluntary Control and the Pragmatic Theory of Belief

Logos and Episteme 6 (4):495-513 (2015)

Authors
Brian Hedden
University of Sydney
Abstract
I argue that a attractive theory about the metaphysics of belief—the prag- matic, interpretationist theory endorsed by Stalnaker, Lewis, and Dennett, among others—implies that agents have a novel form of voluntary control over their beliefs. According to the pragmatic picture, what it is to have a given belief is in part for that belief to be part of an optimal rationalization of your actions. Since you have voluntary control over your actions, and what actions you perform in part determines what beliefs you count as having, this theory entails that you have some voluntary control over your beliefs. However, the pragmatic picture doesn’t entail that you can believe something as a result of intention to believe it. Nevertheless, I argue that the limited sort of voluntary control implied by the pragmatic picture may be of use in vindicating the deontological conception of epistemic justification.
Keywords doxastic voluntarism  intentional stance  belief
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
ISBN(s) 2069-0533
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme20156437
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Humean Supervenience Debugged.David K. Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.William Alston - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:257-299.
Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief.Sharon Ryan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):47-79.
Radical Interpretation.David K. Lewis - 1974 - Synthese 27 (July-August):331-344.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Trust in the Guise of Belief.Anthony Robert Booth - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (2):156-172.
Some Objections to Peels’ Combinatorial Analysis of Belief.Anthony Robert Booth - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (4):605-611.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Doxastic Voluntarism.Rico Vitz - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Belief Control and Intentionality.Matthias Steup - 2012 - Synthese 188 (2):145-163.
Compatibilism and Doxastic Control.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (2):143-152.
An Essay on Doxastic Agency.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Rochester
Acceptance and Deciding to Believe.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Research 29:173-190.
Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence.Danny Frederick - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.
The Free and Voluntary Nature of Believing.Stephen Michael Knaster - 1983 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Believing Intentionally.Matthias Steup - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2673-2694.
A New Rejection of Doxastic Voluntarism.Sergi Rosell - 2009 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (3):97-112.
Holding the Faith True.John Zeis - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):161-170.
Epistemic Virtues and the Deliberative Frame of Mind.Adam Kovach - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (1):105 – 115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-20

Total views
183 ( #44,223 of 2,289,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #12,881 of 2,289,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature