Laboratory Notes, Laboratory Experiences, and Conceptual Analysis: Understanding the Making of Ohm's First Law in Electricity

Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 43 (1):7-27 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Georg Simon Ohm's work in the field of electricity led to what is now considered to be the most fundamental law of electrical circuits, Ohm's Law. Much less known is that only months earlier, Ohm had published another law—one that differed significantly from the now accepted one. The latter entailed a logarithmic relation between the length of the conductor and a parameter that Ohm called “loss of force.” This paper discusses how Ohm came up with an initial law that he felt compelled to correct a few months later. We analyze Ohm's publication as well as his laboratory notes, relating them to our own laboratory experiences while using the replication method to study his work. We also discuss the conceptual background of Ohm's work. We conclude that he was significantly influenced by French studies in the field of electricity, most notably the ones by Charles Augustin Coulomb.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revealing sparks: John Wesley and the religious utility of electrical healing.Paola Bertucci - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Science 39 (3):341-362.
Die Elektrizität im Weltbild Johann Gottlob Krügers.Martin Schneider - 2006 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 29 (4):275-291.
A possible origin of atmospheric electricity.L. Wåhlin - 1973 - Foundations of Physics 3 (4):459-472.
Laws and criteria.Alexander Bird - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):511-42.
Electricity, Knowledge, and the Nature of Progress in Priestley's Thought.John G. McEvoy - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):1-30.
A non-electrical rotation table for laboratory animals.F. S. Fearing & F. W. Weymouth - 1926 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 9 (1):67.
Domesticating modernity: the Electrical Association for Women, 1924–86.Carroll Pursell - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Science 32 (1):47-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-20

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Towards a logical reconstruction of revolutionary change: The case of Ohm as an example.Michael Heidelberger - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (2):103-121.

Add more references