In Timothy Shanahan & Paul Smart (eds.), Blade Runner 2049: A Philosophical Exploration. Routledge. pp. 87-107 (2019)

Christopher McCarroll
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Richard Heersmink
Tilburg University
Memory is everywhere in Blade Runner 2049. From the dead tree that serves as a memorial and a site of remembrance (“Who keeps a dead tree?”), to the ‘flashbulb’ memories individuals hold about the moment of the ‘blackout’, when all the electronic stores of data were irretrievably erased (“everyone remembers where they were at the blackout”). Indeed, the data wiped out in the blackout itself involves a loss of memory (“all our memory bearings from the time, they were all damaged in the blackout”). Memory, and lack of it, permeates place, where from the post-blackout Las Vegas Deckard remembers it as somewhere you could “forget your troubles.” Memory is a commodity, called upon and consumed by the Wallace Corporation, purchased from the memory-maker, Dr Ana Stelline, who constructs and implants “the best memories” in replicants so as to instil in them real human responses. Memory is ubiquitous in Blade Runner 2049, involving humans, replicants, objects, and machines. Even “God,” we are told, “remembered Rachael.” Nowhere, though, is the depiction of memory more important than in the attempt to solve a question of identity. Officer K has a memory of his past. Even though he knows it is an implant, it is a memory he is emotionally attached to, frequently narrating it to Joi, his digital girlfriend. But it is a memory that starts to puzzle and trouble him. When K discovers the remains of a dead replicant, a female NEXUS-7, he uncovers a secret—this replicant was pregnant and died during childbirth, a discovery that could “break the world.” K is charged with hunting down the child and making the problem disappear. Yet as K starts seeking answers to the question of the child’s identity he gets inextricably caught up in the mystery. Is he merely Officer K, or is he Joe, the miracle child of Rachael and Deckard? The answer to this question hinges on K’s memory. But is the memory genuine? Is the memory his? Blade Runner 2049 encourages us to think deeply about the nature of memory, identity, and the relation between them. Indeed, the film does not just serve as a starting point for thinking about philosophical issues related to memory and identity. Rather, as we show in this chapter, the film seems to offer a view on these philosophical issues. Blade Runner 2049 offers us a view of memory as spread out over people, objects, and the environment, and it shows us that memory’s role in questions of identity goes beyond merely accurately recalling one’s past. Identity depends not on memory per se, but partly on what we use memory for.
Keywords Memory  Narrative  Identity  Philosophy of film  distributed self
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
The Constitution of Selves.Marya Schechtman (ed.) - 1996 - Cornell University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Varieties of the Extended Self.Richard Heersmink - 2020 - Consciousness and Cognition 85:103001.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Memory and Identity.Marya Schechtman - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):65-79.
A Defence of Quasi-Memory.Rebecca Roache - 2006 - Philosophy 81 (2):323-355.
Memory, Responsibility, and Identity.Ross Poole - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75:263-286.
Memory, Responsibility, and Identity.Ross Poole - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (1):263-286.
To Remember Memory: Phenomenologically-Hermeneutical Punctuations.Ella Buceniece - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:15-24.
Memory and Mineness in Personal Identity.Rebecca Roache - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):479-489.
Memory.Jordi Fernandez - 2014 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Blackwell.
Collective Identity and Collective Memory in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur.David J. Leichter - 2012 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 3 (1):114-131.
The Truth About Memory.M. Schectman - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):3-18.
At the Threshold of Memory: Collective Memory Between Personal Experience and Political Identity.Jeffrey Andrew Barash - 2011 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 3 (2):249-267.


Added to PP index

Total views
544 ( #15,925 of 2,507,015 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #10,564 of 2,507,015 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes