Vindicating methodological triangulation

Synthese 196 (8):3067-3081 (2019)

Authors
Liam Kofi Bright
London School of Economics
Remco Heesen
University of Western Australia
Abstract
Social scientists use many different methods, and there are often substantial disagreements about which method is appropriate for a given research question. In response to this uncertainty about the relative merits of different methods, W. E. B. Du Bois advocated for and applied “methodological triangulation”. This is to use multiple methods simultaneously in the belief that, where one is uncertain about the reliability of any given method, if multiple methods yield the same answer that answer is confirmed more strongly than it could have been by any single method. Against this, methodological purists believe that one should choose a single appropriate method and stick with it. Using tools from voting theory, we show Du Boisian methodological triangulation to be more likely to yield the correct answer than purism, assuming the scientist is subject to some degree of diffidence about the relative merits of the various methods. This holds even when in fact only one of the methods is appropriate for the given research question.
Keywords philosophy of social science  methodological triangulation  formal epistemology  voting theory  W. E. B. Du Bois
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016, 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem.Christin List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):70-72.
The Robust Volterra Principle.Michael Weisberg & Kenneth Reisman - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (1):106-131.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Remco Heesen & Liam Kofi Bright - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axz029.
Data, Epistemic Values, and Multiple Methods in Case Study Research.Julie Zahle - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Methodological Triangulation in Nursing Research.Mark Risjord, Margaret Moloney & Sandra Dunbar - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):40-59.
On Methodological Problems in Aesthetics.Johanna Liu - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (2):124-140.
Kilka uwag o metodach w filozofii.John R. Searle - 2005 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 53 (2):19-23.
Davidsonian Triangulation and Heideggerian Comportment.Timothy J. Nulty - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):443 – 453.
Triangulating with Davidson.Claudine Verheggen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):96-103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-07

Total views
93 ( #81,681 of 2,243,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #22,082 of 2,243,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature