Philosophical Studies 175 (4):831-858 (2018)

Authors
Remco Heesen
University of Western Australia
Abstract
Should editors of scientific journals practice triple-anonymous reviewing? I consider two arguments in favor. The first says that insofar as editors’ decisions are affected by information they would not have had under triple-anonymous review, an injustice is committed against certain authors. I show that even well-meaning editors would commit this wrong and I endorse this argument. The second argument says that insofar as editors’ decisions are affected by information they would not have had under triple-anonymous review, it will negatively affect the quality of published papers. I distinguish between two kinds of biases that an editor might have. I show that one of them has a positive effect on quality and the other a negative one, and that the combined effect could be either positive or negative. Thus I do not endorse the second argument in general. However, I do endorse this argument for certain fields, for which I argue that the positive effect does not apply.
Keywords Feminist philosophy of science  Bias  Peer review  Social epistemology  Formal epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017, 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0895-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.Michael Strevens - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79.
Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Remco Heesen & Liam Kofi Bright - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):635-663.
Formal Models of Scientific Inquiry in a Social Context: An Introduction.Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer & AnneMarie Borg - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (2):211-217.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Ethical "Blind Spot": Problems of Anonymous Letters to the Editor.Bill Reader - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):62 – 76.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-25

Total views
174 ( #60,363 of 2,448,397 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #73,126 of 2,448,397 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes